Legal Opinion
Young v. Lamson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 3, 1960No. 850PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holdens J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover for damages sustained when her 1955 Chevrolet sedan collided with the rear of a motor vehicle the defendant had halted in the highway. The accident occurred after dark, on November 10,1958.
On that evening, the plaintiff’s son, Charles Young, was visiting at the plaintiff’s home in Williamstowni While trying to repair the plaintiff’s television set, Charles decided that a new tube was needed. He left the plaintiff’s home to procure this part. An automobile owned by Charles was in the yard, but he had general permission to use the plaintiff’s car. And on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Osborn v. ClineNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ploof v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Palmer v. MarceilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Miller v. Service and Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Capello's Admr. v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gerrish Corporation, Doing Business as Gerrish Motors, Doing Business as Scrub-A-Dub v. Universal Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- American Fidelity Co. v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Harte v. Peerless Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Smith v. Blow and Cote, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Bruton v. Automatic Welding & Supply CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.