State v. Alpert
Supreme Court of Vermont
Information for receiving stolen goods. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury at a special term in January, 1913, Chittenden County, Taylor, J., presiding. Verdict, not guilty on tbe first, third and sixth counts, and guilty on the second, fourth, and fifth counts, and judgment thereon. The respondent excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
The information contains six counts charging the respondent with receiving goods in August and September, 1912, with knowledge that they had been stolen. The first count charges the receiving of a box of clothes; the second, three boxes of dress goods and umbrellas; the third, twenty boxes of Empire rubbers; the fourth, thirty boxes of Hood’s rubbers; the fifth, certain perfumery; the sixth, a box of alarm clocks. The respondent was acquitted on the first, third and sixth' counts, and convicted on the second, fourth, and fifth counts. The exceptions will be considered under the numbers given…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Clement v. GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- Commonwealth v. MeserveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Commonwealth v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Huggins v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BorisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Kasle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Harte v. Peerless Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- State v. BealeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.