Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Hanover Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 1, 1972No. 76-71PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment that Hanover Insurance Company is bound to appear and defend the plaintiff-appellee, its insured, in a suit brought against him as a consequence of an automobile accident.
The accident occurred on June 22, 1968. The appellee was an employee of the highway department of the town of Mount Holly and had been for many years. On the date in question the road commissioner of the town instructed the appellee to go to Rutland and drive a 1962 International truck back to the town garage at Mount Holly, it having been there about three weeks for an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. HouleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
- Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Harte v. Peerless Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Anderson v. KnappSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Noyes v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. CollinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.