Legal Opinion

Northern Oil Company, Inc. v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1965No. 443, Docket 29509PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Circuit Judge.

The Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc. (Socony Mobil), appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the District of Vermont in the amount of $95,000 based on a jury verdict. We reverse the judgment and remand the action for a new trial on the ground that certain hearsay testimony was improperly admitted.

This is a diversity action brought by the Northern Oil Company, Inc. (Northern) against Socony Mobil. It was tried under Vermont law on a theory of malicious prosecution.

In the former action which is alleged to have been maliciously prosecuted Socony Mobil originally…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Goetz v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. John H. Cromling v. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie R.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  5. Ryan v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Cameron v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc., and Litton Industries Credit Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees- Cross v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York Telephone Company, Inc., New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. The Southland Corporation and S. Richmond Dole and Eugene Mastropieri, the Southland Corporation, Eugene MastropieriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Oreck Corporation v. Whirlpool Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API