Legal Opinion

Brainard v. Brainard

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1947No. Civ. 15902PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Mrs. Brainard appeals from an order denying the motion to vacate her default and to set aside the ensuing interlocutory decree of divorce. The complaint was filed January 12, 1946. She filed her answer and cross-complaint 19 days later in which she alleged that a satisfactory property settlement had been effected on January 25. On February 27, 15 days after the amended complaint had been filed, the parties stipulated that the cross-complaint should be dismissed. Appellant defaulted on the first day of March and the interlocutory decree was entered March 21. Almost four months, later, July 17,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hogarty v. HogartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. White v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Small v. SmallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. William B. Logan & Associates v. Monogram Precision Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Wolfson v. HaddanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API