Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
This appeal is from an order denying appellants ’ motion to enjoin Nathan G- Gray and Richard F, Swisher from representing respondents as their attorneys. The action is a stockholders’ derivative suit, and its primary purpose is to set aside a transfer of substantial assets of the corporation alleged to have been' made for an inadequate consideration.
From the record it appears that appellant Jacuzzi Bros., Incorporated, is a California corporation, and that Candido Jacuzzi is its general manager. Joseph Jacuzzi, Giocondo Jacuzzi, Dante Jacuzzi and Carmelo Guarneri are directors. Also named as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Wutchumna Water Co. v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
- People v. BelousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- E. L. Cord, Etc. v. Calvin J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Moses v. McGarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.