Legal Opinion

Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1963No. Civ. 20698PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

This appeal is from an order denying appellants ’ motion to enjoin Nathan G- Gray and Richard F, Swisher from representing respondents as their attorneys. The action is a stockholders’ derivative suit, and its primary purpose is to set aside a transfer of substantial assets of the corporation alleged to have been' made for an inadequate consideration.

From the record it appears that appellant Jacuzzi Bros., Incorporated, is a California corporation, and that Candido Jacuzzi is its general manager. Joseph Jacuzzi, Giocondo Jacuzzi, Dante Jacuzzi and Carmelo Guarneri are directors. Also named as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wutchumna Water Co. v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
  2. People v. BelousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. E. L. Cord, Etc. v. Calvin J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Moses v. McGarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API