Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Sheridan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1950No. 35,070PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This case involves a boundary-line dispute. Plaintiffs are the fee owners of a tract of land in Rice county, comprising a part of the NE14 of SE^ of section 35, township 110 north, range 21 west, which contains about 21 acres.

Defendant Esther Sheridan owns the land immediately to the west of and adjoining plaintiffs’ land. Both parcels are bounded on the south by trunk highway No. 60, which runs west from the city of Faribault.

An old barbed-wire fence separates the two tracts of land. In 1917, plaintiff Floyd R. Simpson employed Walter G. Docken, Rice county surveyor, to make…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Hoverson v. HoversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Engquist v. WirtjesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Bjerketvedt v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Grubb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Stanard v. UrbanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Miller v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API