Legal Opinion

Olson v. Burk

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1905No. 14,244—(50)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Nicollet county, Webber, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and findings in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

Action of ejectment to recover possession of government lots 3 and 4, and the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section 13, in township 110, range 28, in the county of Nicollet, this state.

The complaint is in the usual form for the recovery of the possession *457of real estate and damages for withholding the same. The answer denied the plaintiff’s title, and alleged title to the land to be in the defendant by adverse possession thereof for more than twenty-five years. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and findings of fact and conclusions of law were made in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of St. Paul v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Brown v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Johnson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Sage v. RudnickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Vermont Marble CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  2. Oahu Railway & Land Co. v. KailiHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Co-Operative Building Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1909
  4. Mitchell v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Yourik v. MalloneeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API