Platner v. Vincent
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
This appeal is from a judgment awarding damages for the breach of the covenants of title and quiet enjoyment contained in a deed of real property executed by the defendant and her husband, as grantors, to the plaintiff, as grantee. The appeal is taken on the judgment-roll alone.
The amended complaint was before us for review upon an appeal from the judgment entered after demurrer sustained without leave to amend. (Platner v. Vincent, 187 Cal. 443 [202 Pac. 655].)
On June 5, 1916, plaintiff and C. H. Vincent, husband of defendant-appellant, Lillian Vincent, agreed to an exchange of properties…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- McGoon v. ScalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Marston v. RueWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Gee v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Holland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Stevinson Water District v. RodunerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.