In Re Hall
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to secure release from imprisonment under a warrant charging violation of municipal ordinance regulating dancing. Granted and petitioner discharged. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Petitioner is imprisoned under a warrant of arrest issued out of the police court of the city of Pasadena upon a complaint charging him with a violation of an ordinance entitled “An ordinance of the city of Pasadena regulating the hours during which dancing may be conducted and dance-music performed in certain places.” So far as material, the ordinance reads: “Between the hours of 10 o’clock P. M. and 8 o’clock A. M. of the next succeeding day, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation in control of any room or hall, any portion of which or any window of which is within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- In re FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In Re KelsoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Passaic v. Paterson Bill Posting & Advertising & Sign Painting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ernest v. FalerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Robins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Alves v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- 7978 CORPORATION v. PitchessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.