Legal Opinion

Ernest v. Faler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 5, 1985No. 57,013PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Prager, J.:

This is an action to recover damages resulting from alleged negligence in the application of a chemical pesticide by an aerial sprayer, the defendant-appellee, Robert D. Faler, who operates Bob Faler Aerial Spray Service. On June 4, 1982, the defendant sprayed a pesticide on real property adjacent to the property of the plaintiff, Bill Ernest, in Montgomery County. In his petition, plaintiff alleged that some of the chemical spray drifted over to plaintiff s real estate and caused damage to growing walnut trees in an amount in excess of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Henry Ex Rel. Henry v. BauderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Noel Ex Rel. Noel v. Menninger FoundationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Hanson v. KrehbielSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Farley v. EngelkenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Jenkins v. Amchem Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API