Matchett v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Grant Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— The substance of the appellant's complaint is this: He entered the service of the appellee as a brakeman, and his duties required him to set the brakes upon the trains on which he was required to work. On the 13th day of December, 1887, he was working on a freight train composed of many cars. He was signaled to set the brake. He undertook to discharge this duty in obedience to the signal, *336at the time believing that the brake and appliances were “ in order and not out of repair.” The brake was defective and out of repair “in this, the ratchet upon the same, used to hold the brake when…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- McCoy v. Kokomo Railway & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Hoosier Stone Co. v. McCainIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. EastmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Indiana Stone Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.