Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Heck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1898No. 17,684PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellee, as administrator of one Aaron Heck, deceased, sued the appellant to recover damages under the statute for injuries resulting in the death of said deceased, as is alleged, by the negligence of the appellant. A trial of the issues made resulted in a special verdict, upon which the court rendered judgment for the plaintiff.

The errors assigned, and not waived, call in question the sufficiency of the complaint, the action of the circuit court in overruling demurrers to each paragraph of the complaint and in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, and for *294judgment in its favor…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Oölitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. White's Admrx. v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  5. Dill v. MarmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API