Legal Opinion

Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. Eastman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1893No. 791PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, C. J.

The appellee was a brakeman employed on appellant’s road running over the bridge and trestle between New Albany and Louisville. He recovered *515judgment for damages resulting from an injury received by reason of the negligence of appellant in failing to supply a safe car, the defect being the insufficiency of a gate placed on the platform at the end of the car, against which appellee fell. . By reason of its opening he was thrown from the train.

Two causes for a new trial are asserted here, the insufficiency of the evidence and error of law in giving the second instruction asked by appellee.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HolcombIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. WitteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. New Kentucky Coal Co. v. AlbaniIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Wortman v. MinichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API