Legal Opinion

Hoosier Stone Co. v. McCain

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1892No. 15,279PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee, as the administrator of the estate of James A. McCain, deceased, seeks'to recover damages for the death of the deceased, which, it is charged, was caused hy the negligence of the appellant. The complaint alleges that the deceased was in the service of the appellant and was injured while in the line of his duty, without any fault on his part.

It is insisted hy the appellant’s counsel that the third paragraph of the complaint is bad, for the reason that it affirmatively shows that the injury to the appellee’s intestate was caused. hy the negligence of a co-employe. We can not agree…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Dayharsh v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Peerless Stone Co. v. WrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API