Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Pacitti
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 10, 1996No. 14471PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff1 appeals from the judgment rendered denying its application for temporary and permanent injunctions2 against the defendants Joseph Pacitti and Taco Bell Corporation (Taco Bell). The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied its request for the issuance of an injunction and (2) refused to admit certain evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The underlying facts as found by the trial court are not substantially in dispute. Pacitti is the owner of a development called the Vernon Park Plaza in Vernon; Taco Bell operates a restaurant in the development. *54…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Berin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Crabtree v. CoyleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. CiarleglioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fleet National Bank v. BurkeConnecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- New Breed Logistics, Inc. v. Ct Indy Nh Tt, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Masayda v. PedroncelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Department of Transportation v. PacittiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996