Legal Opinion
Masayda v. Pedroncelli
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 22, 1996No. 14915PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction to enjoin the defendants from operating a trucking business and rebuilding a barn on their property in Watertown. The judgment also included an award of costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, and a civil penalty in the amount of $100 per day for a violation of a cease and desist order.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiffs are Stanley Masayda, the planning and zoning officer of the town of Watertown, and Mary Greene, the assistant planning and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- L. Wayne Furtney v. Simsbury Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Johnson v. MurzynConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Crabtree v. CoyleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of the Town of Wallingford v. AndrewsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Brown v. Bunning, No. Cv 97 0054982 S (Jan. 30, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Town of Chaplin P. Z.C. v. Abiding Word, No. Cv 960054308s (May 16, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997