Legal Opinion

Crabtree v. Coyle

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 22, 1989No. 7027PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The plaintiff, the acting zoning enforcement officer of the town of Milford, initiated this action pursuant to General Statutes § 8-121 seeking a permanent *209injunction to restrain the defendant property owner from continuing to deposit certain debris near a designated wetlands area and to force the defendant to remove the debris already deposited. After a trial, the court rendered judgment for the plaintiff in part. The court enjoined the defendant from depositing any further fill within twenty-five feet of the wetlands, but refused to order the defendant to abate the violation. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Hammerberg v. LeinertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Johnson v. MurzynConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  4. Dimmock v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Gorra Realty, Inc. v. JetmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Fisette v. DiPietroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Town of Monroe v. RenzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Department of Transportation v. PacittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API