Legal Opinion
Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 31, 2000No. CIV. A. 3:98-CV-1657PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY’S MOTION FOR AWARD OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES [DKT. NO. 433] & MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION [DKT. NO. 431]
HALL, District Judge.
Bristol Technology, Inc. (“Bristol”) commenced this action against Microsoft Corp. (“Microsoft”) on August 18, 1998. Its fourteen-count complaint alleged federal and state antitrust claims and other state statutory and common law claims, including violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. § 42-110a et seq. Bristol also filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. After several scheduling conferences and…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sawtelle v. Waddell & Reed, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Schuchmann v. Air Services Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Mercer v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001
- BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.