Bank of Boston Connecticut v. Ciarleglio
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant, Edward E. Ciarleglio II, appeals from a judgment rendered on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Bank of Boston Connecticut, on both the complaint and his counterclaim. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) restricted his cross-examination of witnesses and presentation of direct and rebuttal evidence, (2) commented on and emphasized certain evidence in its jury charge, and (3) excluded the testimony and reports of treating physicians. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. On March 23, 1987, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. VassSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Yale University School of Medicine v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Felsted v. Kimberly Auto Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. LaCasseConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gemme v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. CaballeroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Rosenberg v. CastanedaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Sung v. ButterworthConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Department of Transportation v. PacittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.