Legal Opinion

Barta v. Hinds

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1998No. Civil 970133PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Richard Barta appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial after a jury awarded him $5,604.70 in damages for pain and suffering for injuries sustained in a collision between Barta’s motor home and a grain truck driven by Ricky Hinds. The jury, however, awarded Barta nothing for medical expenses or permanent disability. We conclude the special jury verdict is inconsistent and contrary to the evidence, and the trial court abused its discretion in denying the new trial motion. We reverse and remand for a new trial on all issues.

I

[¶ 2] On September 24, 1993,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grenz v. KelschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Reisenauer v. SchaeferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fontes v. DixonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Nesseth v. OmlidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hector v. Metro Centers, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. KloseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Schneider v. SchaafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Symington v. MayoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Myer v. RyggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API