Legal Opinion

Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2004No. 20040061PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc. (“Clinic”), and Kim Brummond appealed from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding Alissa Forster $264,884.57 in damages, attorney fees, costs, and disbursements in Forster’s defamation action against them. The Clinic and Brummond also appealed from orders denying their motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Forster appealed from a judgment dismissing her employment contract claim against the Clinic and from an order denying her motion to alter or amend that judgment. We conclude there is…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cweklinsky v. Mobil Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wilson v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Grand Forks County Social Services v. T.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Edward H. Schwartz Construction, Inc. v. DriessenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Thompson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API