Legal Opinion

Nesseth v. Omlid

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1998No. Civil 970099PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Julie Nesseth appealed the judgment and the denial of her motion for a new trial after a jury awarded only medical expenses of $5,243.80 for her injuries in an automobile collision. We affirm.

[¶ 2] On September 20, 1988, Julie, driving a borrowed auto, stopped at a University Avenue intersection in Grand Forks. She was hit from behind by Magdalene Omlid’s auto. The impact pushed Julie’s auto into the one ahead of her, sending that driver to the hospital. After speaking to police at the scene, Julie left to attend her cousin’s funeral. At the funeral, she fainted and was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hoge v. HogeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Slaubaugh v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Stoner v. Nash Finch, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. McDermott v. CARIE, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Barta v. HindsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lemer v. CampbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rittenour v. GibsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API