Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Schaaf

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. 990068PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bennie, Helen, and Monte Schneider appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial in a tort and breach of contract action brought against Michael J. Schaaf and the estate of Michael V. Schaaf. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Schneiders’ motion for a new trial and in affirming summary judgment dismissal of their tort claims against the Schaafs. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Bennie and Helen Schneider, both in their 70s at the time of trial, own a small farm in Stark County. In 1980, Michael J. Schaaf (“Michael”) began farming with…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Jerry Lynn Young v. Neil B. Biggers, Jr., J.W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ges, Inc. v. CorbittNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API