Legal Opinion

Fontes v. Dixon

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1996No. Civil 950272PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Mathias Fontes appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding Fontes noneconomic damages and the trial court’s order denying Fontes’ motion for a new trial. Because the special verdict answers are inconsistent and absent the trial court’s explanation of its reasons for denying the motion for a new trial, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

On February 20, 1993, Fontes was a passenger in a Nodak Cab van which was dispatched by Fontes’ employer, Burlington Northern Railroad, to transport Fontes and other Burlington Northern employees from Grafton to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slaubaugh v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Nelson v. Trinity Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Binstock v. Fort Yates Public School District No. 4North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Grenz v. KelschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barta v. HindsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rittenour v. GibsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Moszer v. WittNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Nesseth v. OmlidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Carpenter v. RohrerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API