Legal Opinion
Grenz v. Kelsch
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1989No. Civ. 880198PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Candace Kelsch appeals from an order for a partial new trial granted for David Grenz. We reverse.
Grenz sustained injuries in a car/pedestrian accident and sued Kelsch, the driver of the car. A jury found total damages of $27,000, and apportioned thirty percent negligence to Grenz and seventy percent to Kelsch. Grenz moved for additur or a new trial on damages. Concluding that the jury verdict was inconsistent and the evidence insufficient to justify the amount of damages, the trial court granted additur of $15,000 for future pain, discomfort and mental anguish and $20,000 for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Richard Williams v. The City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Juan Antonio Borras v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Slaubaugh v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Barta v. HindsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Holmgren v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Delzer v. United Bank of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Binstock v. Fort Yates Public School District No. 4North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.