McManus v. Arnold Taxi Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
— Plaintiff, by his father as guardian ad litem, sued the above-named defendants to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him as a result of being run over' by an automobile driven by defendant L. A. Arnold. The action was tried before the court sitting without a jury, and judgment was rendered against the defendant Arnold alone, from which judgment he has appealed.
Section 20 (a) of the Motor "Vehicle Act in force at the time of the accident read in part as follows: “The driver or operator of any vehicle in or upon a public highway shall drive or operate such vehicle in a careful…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Stotler ex rel. Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Tucker v. Buffalo Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Durkee v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Rawlins v. LoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lane v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.