Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Buffalo Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 15, 1907PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Before Krugh, J., Union, September Term, 1905. ■ Action by Boyd Tucker, by guardian, against Buffalo Cotton Mills. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: As to disqualification of juror: Code, 1902. sec. 3944; 31 S. C., 357; 54 S. C., 153. Sum paid physician by father not element of damages: 8 Ency., 647, 648. As to examination of witness: 33 S. C., 107. Incapacity of infant to do wrong: 35 S. C., 35; 37 S. C., 463; 70 S. C., 350; 7 Ency, 408, 410; 1 A. & E.…

Read the full summary

Before Krugh, J., Union, September Term, 1905. ■ Action by Boyd Tucker, by guardian, against Buffalo Cotton Mills. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: As to disqualification of juror: Code, 1902. sec. 3944; 31 S. C., 357; 54 S. C., 153. Sum paid physician by father not element of damages: 8 Ency., 647, 648. As to examination of witness: 33 S. C., 107. Incapacity of infant to do wrong: 35 S. C., 35; 37 S. C., 463; 70 S. C., 350; 7 Ency, 408, 410; 1 A. & E. An. Cas, 893; 39 U. R. A, 760'; 83 U. S, 15; Thomp. on Neg, 308, 309, 313, 314, 5369; 17 Wall, 657; 58 S. C, 80; 3 McC,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The plaintiff, a minor, eight years old, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while in the employ of the defendant as spinner in its cotton mill, and recovered a judgment for $1,000, from which defendant appeals.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff was ordered by a representative of defendant to go to the oil cup and saturate waste cloth with oil and oil his rollers, 'and that said oil cup was dangerously close to the rapidly revolving gearing, and that such undertaking was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Newbury ex rel. Newbury v. Getchel & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Pratt Coal & Iron Co. v. BrawleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Rhodes v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Brabham v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  5. Mason v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Brown v. FingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Owens v. Andrews Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Hughey v. AusbornSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. Sexton v. Noll Const. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API