Legal Opinion

Rawlins v. Lory

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1941No. Civ. 11458PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the wilful misconduct of defendant Martin W. Lory. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury and plaintiff had judgment against defendant Martin W. Lory and the parents of said defendant in the sum of $1750. Defendants appeal from said judgment.

Defendants’ main contention on this appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to show wilful misconduct on the part of defendant Martin W. Lory. We find no merit in this contention. There was some conflict in the evidence but considering, as we must, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Norton v. PuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Linberg v. StantoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Wright v. SellersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Enos v. MontoyaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Dodds v. BucknumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API