State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. Hollister
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The dispositive question in this case is whether a district court has authority to afford affirmative relief as a product of its review of a workers’ compensation proceeding. A second question that must be resolved is whether the district court properly ruled that the injured workman had not engaged in conduct that justified the invocation of the injurious practices statute, § 27-12-412, W.S.1977. 1 A question related to both of these issues is whether the district court improperly substituted its judgment for that of the administrative hearing officer. We agree with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Bd. of Trustees of SD No. 4 v. ColwellWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Hohnholt v. Basin Electric Power Co-OpWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Kittleson v. HiblerWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Mills v. ReynoldsWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. TaffnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Workers' Compensation Claim of Little America Refining Co. v. WittWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Dougherty v. J.W. Williams, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.