Legal Opinion

Mills v. Reynolds

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1991No. 89-193, 89-195PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The primary question that must be resolved in this case is whether Wyo. Const, art. 10, § 4 forecloses the legislature from extending the immunity of employers to co-employees acting within the scope of their employment. Stated another way, is the legislature foreclosed by the constitution from eliminating a cause of action that had been earlier recognized in the law? In addition to challenging the authority to eliminate a cause of action, the primary issue also presents a question of interpretation of Wyo. Const, art. 10, § 4. Additional issues are presented by the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Nehring v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Limbaugh v. Coffee Medical CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  4. BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Mills v. ReynoldsWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API