Kittleson v. Hibler
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kimball, Justice.
In this proceeding the employer, plaintiff in error, contests the claim of the workman, defendant in error, for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. There was a jury trial in the district court, and the judgment on the verdict awarded the workman compensation for total permanent disability.
In the Workmen’s Compensation Act it is provided (Sec. 4327, C. S. 1920) that a claim for compensation under that act shall be investigated by the judge of the district court “in such a manner as he may deem necessary to ascertain whether the claim for compensation or the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Zancanelli v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1918
- Rish v. Iowa Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Kirchner v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Eberle v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cardin v. Morrison-KnudsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Big Horn County v. IlesWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Vaughan v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Mustanen v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. HollisterWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.