Legal Opinion

Hohnholt v. Basin Electric Power Co-Op

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1989No. 89-154PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Chief Justice.

The sole question we must decide here is whether the hearing examiner’s finding that a worker’s compensation claimant’s need for psychiatric treatment did not arise from an injury sustained in the course of employment is supported by substantial evidence.

Petitioner Reed Hohnholt frames the issue as:

“Were medical expenses for psychiatric care properly denied where the evidence showed that such care was precipitated by an injury in the course of employment?”

Respondent Basin Electric Power Co-op frames the issue as:

“Based on the evidence produced by employer and employee,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Graves v. Utah Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Lehman v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Romero v. Davy McKee Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Workers' Compensation Claim of Jackson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. WhiteWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API