Hohnholt v. Basin Electric Power Co-Op
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Chief Justice.
The sole question we must decide here is whether the hearing examiner’s finding that a worker’s compensation claimant’s need for psychiatric treatment did not arise from an injury sustained in the course of employment is supported by substantial evidence.
Petitioner Reed Hohnholt frames the issue as:
“Were medical expenses for psychiatric care properly denied where the evidence showed that such care was precipitated by an injury in the course of employment?”
Respondent Basin Electric Power Co-op frames the issue as:
“Based on the evidence produced by employer and employee,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Graves v. Utah Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Lehman v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by44 opinions
- Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Romero v. Davy McKee Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Workers' Compensation Claim of Jackson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. WhiteWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.