Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Scullion

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1936No. 1995PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

This case chiefly involves the proper construction of certain provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of this state, Chapter 124, W. R. S. 1931. The facts material to be considered are substantially these: H. Scullion, the defendant in error, on the 15th day of July, 1934, was an employee of the plaintiff in error, The Texas Company, and engaged in the work of assisting in the unloading of some heavy steel pipe, the pieces thereof each being about eighteen feet long, four inches in diameter and one-half inch thick, weighing approximately 350 pounds. The sections of pipe…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kenyon v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. City of Boulder v. PayneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Conn v. Ed Wederski Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Casper Oil Co. v. EvensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API