Kritzer v. Tracy Engineering Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
Judgment went for plaintiff, from which the defendant Orange Blossom Mining and Milling Company appeals upon the judgment-roll alone. It appears from the complaint that at the times in question the Orange Blossom Mining and Milling Company owned ten contiguous mining claims consolidated and operated as one mine, known as the Orange Blossom Mine, and also owned a millsite located at Bagdad Station, nine miles distant from said mine. That defendant entered into a contract with the Tracy Engineering Company whereby the latter, for the gross sum of money…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Williams v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Capron v. StroutNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- Mulcahy v. GlazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Booth v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Lembke Construction Co. v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Oakland v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Pugh v. MoxleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.