Pugh v. Moxley
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
A number of actions for the foreclosure of mechanics’ liens were consolidated, and judgment in favor of the claimants was entered. The defendant Ryon, asserting an interest as mortgagee, appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
In 1909, Mrs. O. E. Moxley, acting through her husband, J. Moxley, as agent, commenced the construction of two dwelling-houses upon a parcel of land, owned by her, in the city of Riverside. There was no contract for the erection of the buildings, or either of them, as a whole. J. Moxley made contracts with laborers and others for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- King v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bryson v. McConeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- American Buildings Co. v. Wheelers StoresWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Schrader Iron Works, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Curreri v. ViceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- T. F. Korherr v. A. J. Bumb, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Mallard Pond Builders, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.