Legal Opinion

Mining Co. v. Cullins

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 21, 1881No. 80PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Ereoe to-the Supreme' Court of the Territory of Utah. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods

Cullins-brought suit against the Flagstaff Silver Mining Company of Utah, in a district court of the Territory of Utah, to recover wages alleged to be'due to him from the company for services rendered,’ and to subject its property to a lien therefor which he claimed attached by virtue of the statute of the Territory. • The statute declared as follows: —

“Any person or persons who shall perform any work or labor .upon any mine or .furnish any materials therefor in pursuance of any’contract made with the owner or owners of such mine or of any interest therein, shall be entitled to a miner’s lien…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Aikin v. . WassonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Capron v. StroutNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Knight v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  5. McCormick v. Los Angeles City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Springer Land Assn. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Thompson v. Wise Boy Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Washburn v. Inter-Mountain Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API