Trappe v. Bolgard
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Wanda Trappe, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, Robert D. Bolgard and Fleet Bank, N.A. On appeal, the plaintiff appears to claim that the court failed to consider evidence that would demonstrate that the defendants had engaged in a continuing conceal*385ment of facts, which barred the running of the statutes of limitation on her complaint.
Although we attempt to construe the rules of practice liberally in dealing with pro se litigants; see Rosato v. Rosato, 53 Conn. App. 387, 390,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Rosato v. RosatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Baris v. Southbend, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
4Cited by2 opinions
- Verderame v. Trinity Estates Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- In re William H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005