Legal Opinion

In re William H.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 19, 2005No. AC 24134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The appellants1 appeal from the judgment of the Juvenile Court granting in part and denying in part their motion for the release of materials within the possession of the court, the prosecutor’s office and the Stamford police department. The sole appellee, the *513state, limits its opposition on appeal to the requested release of materials within the state’s case file. On appeal, the appellants claim that the court improperly limited the disclosure sought and ruled on an ex parte inquiry seeking the advice of the Juvenile Court as to a court order issued by a second court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Soares v. Max Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. In re Sheldon G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. In re Tayquon H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. In Re James B., Jr.Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KemahSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Ricks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API