Verderame v. Trinity Estates Development Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendants, Trinity Estates Development Corporation 1 and James R. McMahon II, appeal from the judgment of the trial court finding them liable to the substitute plaintiff, Anthony V. Verderame, 2 in the amount of $143,000 plus interest for the balance due on a promissory note. On appeal, the defendants ask us to decide if “the court err[ed] in its finding of facts and conclusions of law.” 3 Because of the lack of legal analysis in the defendants’ brief, we decline to review the court’s findings to determine whether they were clearly erroneous and, accordingly, affirm the judgment…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Ward v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Trappe v. BolgardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
4Cited by4 opinions
- Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Wilson v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Carmichael v. StonkusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Bank of America, N.A. v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014