Legal Opinion

Verderame v. Trinity Estates Development Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 1, 2005No. AC 26132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendants, Trinity Estates Development Corporation 1 and James R. McMahon II, appeal from the judgment of the trial court finding them liable to the substitute plaintiff, Anthony V. Verderame, 2 in the amount of $143,000 plus interest for the balance due on a promissory note. On appeal, the defendants ask us to decide if “the court err[ed] in its finding of facts and conclusions of law.” 3 Because of the lack of legal analysis in the defendants’ brief, we decline to review the court’s findings to determine whether they were clearly erroneous and, accordingly, affirm the judgment…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Trappe v. BolgardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Wilson v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Carmichael v. StonkusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API