Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 12, 2000No. AC 20631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The pro se defendant, Kenneth M. Russell, appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of a family support magistrate to deny his motion for modification of a child support order. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court improperly determined that the defendant failed to dem*107onstrate a change in circumstances that would justify modification.1

The following facts are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. The court dissolved the marriage of the parties and entered a support order for the dependent children on November 9, 1990. On June 18, 1999, the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Burke v. AvitabileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Jacobs v. FazzanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Stewart v. StewartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trappe v. BolgardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Nicholson v. NicholsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Purtill v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API