Russell v. Russell
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The pro se defendant, Kenneth M. Russell, appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of a family support magistrate to deny his motion for modification of a child support order. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court improperly determined that the defendant failed to dem*107onstrate a change in circumstances that would justify modification.1
The following facts are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. The court dissolved the marriage of the parties and entered a support order for the dependent children on November 9, 1990. On June 18, 1999, the…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Burke v. AvitabileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Jacobs v. FazzanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Stewart v. StewartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
4Cited by3 opinions
- Trappe v. BolgardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Nicholson v. NicholsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Purtill v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020