Legal Opinion
Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 9, 1966No. 60 Civ. 4376PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
On November 9, 1960, plaintiff commenced an action for patent infringement against defendants Auburn Spark Plug Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Auburn”) and Drake America Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Drake”) by causing a deputy United States marshal to deliver two copies of the summons and complaint to 640 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York. The marshal’s return of service indicated that said papers were delivered to “R. C. Brucken-thal, Manager”. The complaint specifically named both Auburn and Drake as defendants and alleged upon information…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Jackson v. Fie Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Charles R. Veeck v. Commodity Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Leab v. StreitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.