Legal Opinion

Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 1957No. 310PublishedCited by 581 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whittaker

The question presented is whether 28 U. S. C. § 1400 (b) is the sole and exclusive provision governing venue in patent infringement actions, or whether that section is supplemented by 28 U. S. C. § 1391 (c).

Section 1400 is titled “Patents and copyrights,” and subsection (b) reads:

“(b) Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business.”

Section 1391 is titled “Venue generally,” and subsection (c) reads:

“(c) A corporation may be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by581 opinions

  1. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

576 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API