Legal Opinion

First Valley Leasing, Inc. v. Goushy

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 2, 1992No. Civ. 91-1202 (CSF)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.

Before the court is a motion for summary judgment brought pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by plaintiff, First Valley Leasing, Inc. (“First Valley”). Defendant, Theodore Goushy (“Goushy”), the owner of Bow Sales Co., opposes the motion in all respects. For the following reasons, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Facts

In September 1989, First Valley, a Pennsylvania commercial leasing corporation, was asked by Pagano Performance Truck Parts, Inc. (“Pagano”), a New Jersey…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Coastal Group v. Dryvit SystemsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Lo Bosco v. Kure Engineering Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  3. G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Florian Greenhouse, Inc. v. Cardinal IG Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  5. Automated Salvage Transport, Inc. v. NV KONINKLIJKE KNP BTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API