Legal Opinion
Florian Greenhouse, Inc. v. Cardinal IG Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 26, 1998No. CIV. 97-869(WHW)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
This matter arises from a commercial dispute between Florian Greenhouse, Inc. (“Flo-rian”) and Cardinal IG Corporation (“Cardinal”). Defendant Cardinal moves to dismiss Counts Three, Four, Five, and Six of the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b). It also moves to dismiss plaintiffs claim for punitive damages. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 78, the Court decides this motion without oral argument by counsel. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is denied.
Factual and Procedural Background
For the purposes of this motion to dismiss, the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bracco Diagnostics Inc. v. Bergen Brunswig Drug Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- G & F Graphic Services, Inc. v. Graphic Innovators, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Electric Mobility Corp. v. Bourns Sensors/Controls, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. ChiorazzoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.