Legal Opinion
G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & Budd
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 11, 2001No. 01 CIV. 0216(RWS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant law firms Baron & Budd, Ness Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole (“Ness Motley”), and Weitz & Lux-enberg, and individual defendants Russell Budd (“Budd”), Frederick Baron (“Baron”), Ronald Motley (“Motley”), Joseph Rice (“Rice”), Perry Weitz (‘Weitz”) and Robert Gordon (“Gordon”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for an order dismissing the First Amended Complaint of G-l Holdings (“Holdings”) in its entirety.
This promises to be a hard fought battle between the successor to an asbestos…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. James Scott PendergraftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Deck v. Engineered LaminatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- EED HOLDINGS v. Palmer Johnson Acquisition Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- L.B. v. Town of ChesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.