Legal Opinion
Lo Bosco v. Kure Engineering Ltd.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 11, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-2451PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is opened before the Court upon the motion of defendants for summary judgment. The motion has been decided upon the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons given below the motion will be granted with respect to counts four, seven, eight, and nine only, and with respect to punitive damages. The motion will be denied as to the rest of the complaint.
BACKGROUND
Except as noted below, the facts that constitute the setting of this lawsuit are not disputed. Plaintiff Lo Bosco is an attorney presently…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Cristen M. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Bracco Diagnostics Inc. v. Bergen Brunswig Drug Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- MK STRATEGIES, LLC v. Ann Taylor Stores Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.