Legal Opinion
Grover v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO CTY.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1958No. Civ. 18154PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
This mandamus proceeding concerns application of discovery procedures authorized by 1957 amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1957, chap. 1904, pp. 3321-3336).
Petitioner, as plaintiff, filed a personal injury action April 1, 1957 against Paddock Engineering Company, the real party in interest in the present proceeding. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant stipulated that Dr. O’Connor, acting for defendant, could conduct a physical examination of plaintiff. The examination was had December 5, 1957. At some unspecified date thereafter, Dr. O’Connor prepared and delivered to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Sharff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Kerckhoff-Cuzner Mill & Lumber Co. v. OlmsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Laddon v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Pettie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.