Legal Opinion

Sharff v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1955No. S. F. 19214PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

After a personal injury action was set for trial, the defendants made a motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to submit to an examination by defendants' doctor in the absence of her attorney. Plaintiff consented to the examination but requested that she be permitted to have her attorney present. The respondent court made an order directing that she “submit to an oral and physical examination concerning [her] alleged injuries, which said examination shall be performed in the absence of said plaintiff’s attorney . . . and that further proceedings by plaintiff in the above entitled action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Wood v. Charles W. Hoffman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Williams v. Chattanooga Iron WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wunsch v. WeberNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Vinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cornell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bartell v. McCarrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Edwards v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gonzi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API