Kerckhoff-Cuzner Mill & Lumber Co. v. Olmstead
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.. ' The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
Action to foreclose the lien of a material-man.
The facts of the case, as shown by the findings, are in substance as follows:—
The defendant, Olmstead, owned a lot of land in the city of Los Angeles, and on the sixteenth day of November, 1886, entered into a contract in writing with the defendants, H. N. and D. F. Sheldon, whereby they agreed to construct for him on his said lot a two-story frame dwelling-house under the supervision and to the satisfaction of John C. Pelton, an architect. The contract price was three thousand six hundred dollars, and was made payable as follows:…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Schwartz v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Scarborough v. DuganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Roylance v. San Luis Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Davis & McMillan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.